It is with these books he should read neither too early nor too late nor too young nor too old. Around the World in 80 Days part of it. Do not get me wrong, my goal is not to castigate the literature youth. I'm the first from Alice in Wonderland Peter Pan and among my favorite books.
Yet it is clear that we must read the novel by Verne at an age when the mind is still devoid of any detection of socio-moral prejudices. I can see fans of the man offended, but I can not help it, Verne's work will become part of the great classics that leave me deeply insensitive. In cases like this you've never experienced this strange sensation that causes you to ask: " but what does everyone find him at this guy? "
What I mean is keen on literature and adventure, Verne, I have heard very little since. Its precursor taste for science fiction, its machines back in time while I was pushing a priori naturally to him. But my path has never crossed his. A few months ago, I went with friends to see the stage adaptation of Sébastien Azzopardi, during which we laughed to tears several times. The original was based, so warm and dust in my library and as part me want to read the work, I told myself that this was indeed the right time.
And there, finishing the novel, what a disappointment ! Verne was regarded as a good teacher, I want to replicate a plot, it is not everything. Certainly, the idea is good and fun characters, but why dwell on 278 pages and give us strength to agonize technical descriptions that are designed to spread scientific learning of the author?
And gradually you realize that this bet that causes Mr. Phileas Fogg and his trusty servant Passepartout to travel without even thinking about visiting is relegated to mere entertainment. Worse, 're bored . The episodes could be exciting if the narrator continually adopt this condescending tone. Whenever Fogg seems to be missing a step, you do not even worry - unlike the other characters - because the outcome is so predictable and repetitive that you lose all interest. I can not count the times I looked up to heaven in a display of bad feelings, the endless descriptions of how a particular boat ...
Fogg and Passepartout passed successively by India, China, Japan, the United States, followed by Inspector Fix, convinced that the gentleman is responsible for a stolen bank notes. Fogg is generous, Passepartout he admires more than doubtful (yes my twisted mind tried to imagine a gay romance to spice up my very monotonous reading), Fogg recovered an Indian educated in English, they marry and are happy , Fogg wins his wager. That's about all. No psychology of the characters, no protagonist truly gripping, except perhaps Fogg, and again ... (The worst being Passepartout and Mrs. Aouda, the "good savage").
The example of the good savage allows me to connect with Verne who insists on showing us the local color of each country, the behavior of a particular nation, with a non-hidden racism. It becomes almost disgusting. Several people have responded that it was period, but this kind of apology leaves me frankly doubtful. It's a bit like saying it's okay to be anti-Semite during the Second World War, me see ...
I will conclude on the lack of style of Verne, to once again, not without some provocation, calling into question its status as a major author. Well go read the Verne. It reeks of bias and prejudice that is limit of behaviorism wild early. You feel that every event, every character corresponds to react a certain way. As for the revolutionary side of his technical inventions and imaginative, I'd say it has not aged a reader and the 21st is right not to be impressed. However, comparing with other authors in the same time the reader that I will always be fascinated by the psychological and stylistic richness of Flaubert or the modernity of a Zola.
Moral: go see the play you pay a good portion of Marradi, but try not to inflict pain to read.